๐ SaaS Development Workflow Planning
๐ Introduction
I’ve been diving deeper into how a SaaS company structures its development workflow.
It’s becoming clear that proper environments (local, staging, production) and CI/CD pipelines are essential.
Now I’m at the stage of figuring out where to begin and how to connect the pieces together.
๐️ Core Structure of a SaaS Project
Each component of the software (front-end, admin dashboard, mobile app, etc.) should have:
- Development database & project files ๐ ️
- Staging database & project files ๐งช
- Production database & project files ✅
๐ Components of the System
๐น Front-end (Marketing & Support)
- Landing pages ๐
- Blog posts ๐
- Support docs ๐
- Privacy policy & legal pages ⚖️
- Optional: Paid ticketing systems ๐️, support communities ๐ฅ
๐น Web Application
- Connects to databases (local, staging, production)
- Handles user interaction and core product logic
๐น Admin Dashboard
- Web-based, likely connected to the same databases
- Used for monitoring, management, and internal workflows
๐น Mobile App
- Tied into the same database & authentication system
๐ Starting Point (Implementation Plan)
I realized I should start local, with the database setup.
-
Local Database Setup ๐ป
- Create local DB
- Configure environment variables in monorepo
- Store in
/configfolder
-
Supabase Projects ๐
- Create three DBs:
- Local (dev)
- Staging
- Production
- Create three DBs:
-
Authentication ๐
- Supabase auth enabled for all three environments
- Shared across web app, admin dashboard, and mobile app
-
Data Model (Drizzle ORM) ๐ฑ
- Build consistent schema
- Ensure DB swap works between environments
⚙️ Deployment & CI/CD Challenges
I need to better understand:
-
Vercel auto-deployments
- Right now: pushing changes to GitHub = instant build
- Issue: How to distinguish staging vs. production builds?
-
GitHub Actions ๐ค
- What they are
- How they manage staging vs. production deployments
- How they fit into a CI/CD pipeline
-
Testing Workflow ๐งช
- What testing should happen in staging
- How to decide when to push to production
๐ Current Roadblocks
- ❓ How to configure GitHub Actions for staging & production
- ❓ How deployment workflow differs from Vercel’s current auto-builds
- ❓ How CI/CD pipeline is structured & managed
๐ฎ Next Steps
- ✅ Create and configure three Supabase databases (local, staging, production).
- ✅ Store and manage environment variables properly in monorepo.
- ✅ Configure web app, admin dashboard, and mobile app to connect to correct DB per environment.
- ๐ Research GitHub Actions & CI/CD pipelines for staging vs. production workflows.
- ๐ Understand how testing fits into staging before production release.
๐ฏ Conclusion
I’ve mapped out the overall SaaS project structure and now see the importance of staging, production, and local databases as the backbone.
The biggest unknowns remain around deployment workflows, CI/CD, and GitHub Actions.
For now, the best move is to start small—set up the databases and environment configs—and then gradually solve the deployment challenges.
๐ Do you want me to also make a color-coded diagram/flowchart (like an ERD-style or system architecture map) to visually show the workflow of local → staging → production?
Comments
Post a Comment