Project Update

๐Ÿš€ SaaS Development Workflow Planning

๐ŸŒŸ Introduction

I’ve been diving deeper into how a SaaS company structures its development workflow.
It’s becoming clear that proper environments (local, staging, production) and CI/CD pipelines are essential.
Now I’m at the stage of figuring out where to begin and how to connect the pieces together.


๐Ÿ—️ Core Structure of a SaaS Project

Each component of the software (front-end, admin dashboard, mobile app, etc.) should have:

  • Development database & project files ๐Ÿ› ️
  • Staging database & project files ๐Ÿงช
  • Production database & project files

๐ŸŒ Components of the System

๐Ÿ”น Front-end (Marketing & Support)

  • Landing pages ๐ŸŒ
  • Blog posts ๐Ÿ“
  • Support docs ๐Ÿ“š
  • Privacy policy & legal pages ⚖️
  • Optional: Paid ticketing systems ๐ŸŽŸ️, support communities ๐Ÿ‘ฅ

๐Ÿ”น Web Application

  • Connects to databases (local, staging, production)
  • Handles user interaction and core product logic

๐Ÿ”น Admin Dashboard

  • Web-based, likely connected to the same databases
  • Used for monitoring, management, and internal workflows

๐Ÿ”น Mobile App

  • Tied into the same database & authentication system

๐Ÿ”‘ Starting Point (Implementation Plan)

I realized I should start local, with the database setup.

  1. Local Database Setup ๐Ÿ’ป

    • Create local DB
    • Configure environment variables in monorepo
    • Store in /config folder
  2. Supabase Projects ๐Ÿ˜

    • Create three DBs:
      • Local (dev)
      • Staging
      • Production
  3. Authentication ๐Ÿ”

    • Supabase auth enabled for all three environments
    • Shared across web app, admin dashboard, and mobile app
  4. Data Model (Drizzle ORM) ๐ŸŒฑ

    • Build consistent schema
    • Ensure DB swap works between environments

⚙️ Deployment & CI/CD Challenges

I need to better understand:

  • Vercel auto-deployments

    • Right now: pushing changes to GitHub = instant build
    • Issue: How to distinguish staging vs. production builds?
  • GitHub Actions ๐Ÿค–

    • What they are
    • How they manage staging vs. production deployments
    • How they fit into a CI/CD pipeline
  • Testing Workflow ๐Ÿงช

    • What testing should happen in staging
    • How to decide when to push to production

๐Ÿ“ Current Roadblocks

  • ❓ How to configure GitHub Actions for staging & production
  • ❓ How deployment workflow differs from Vercel’s current auto-builds
  • ❓ How CI/CD pipeline is structured & managed

๐Ÿ”ฎ Next Steps

  1. ✅ Create and configure three Supabase databases (local, staging, production).
  2. ✅ Store and manage environment variables properly in monorepo.
  3. ✅ Configure web app, admin dashboard, and mobile app to connect to correct DB per environment.
  4. ๐Ÿ” Research GitHub Actions & CI/CD pipelines for staging vs. production workflows.
  5. ๐Ÿ” Understand how testing fits into staging before production release.

๐ŸŽฏ Conclusion

I’ve mapped out the overall SaaS project structure and now see the importance of staging, production, and local databases as the backbone.
The biggest unknowns remain around deployment workflows, CI/CD, and GitHub Actions.
For now, the best move is to start small—set up the databases and environment configs—and then gradually solve the deployment challenges.


๐Ÿ‘‰ Do you want me to also make a color-coded diagram/flowchart (like an ERD-style or system architecture map) to visually show the workflow of local → staging → production?

Comments